Beware, this was immediately censored by Facebook. It doesn’t matter that I taught sexuality and have degrees in medicine and religious studies, object to Liberal and Communist censorship, and have been asked about this by hundreds of patients, we are seeing the dying of the light. This is being done by corporate legal hegemony.
1. Oral sex as fore play. I don’t think there is evidence against this.
2. Lesbian same sex oral sex. Not really controversial. While many African states still outlaw gay males Sex these ‘macho’ African states allow ‘lesbian Sex’. I think they like to watch too:}
3. Homosexual oral sex. This was particularly popular in Ancient Greece and is depicted on their pottery. It’s interesting in the jail men who ‘accept oral Sex’ do not consider themselves gay. A Mexican policeman who ‘used’ boys thought of himself as ‘super macho’. The distinction here is ‘receptive’ versus ‘active’. Homosexuality by this creed is ‘female like’. The Pink Swastika researched the high incidence of sexual deviation in the Nazi especially the SS. The homosexuals who went to the gas chambers were effeminate and ‘receptive’ or ‘bottoms’ or ‘queens’. The macho men declared themselves as super sexed and having so much sex they could spread it around. This group today would be called bisexual, admittedly tight assed bisexual but bisexual nonetheless.
4. Swallowing Semen. The distinction with the acceptance of semen orally is another issue of controversy. It certainly was a long used upper class birth control technique and know for centuries by courtesans. It was interestingly least associated with the spread of disease. There are indeed many gay men who did not desist from oral receptive sex throughout the HIV crisis and simply didn’t get HIV even though they had ‘swallowed the semen’ of infected men. Heterosexual women were equally immune from disease despite ‘swallowing semen’ from infected men. It’s not that STD could not be spread with oral sex. The chance of the ‘giver’ getting disease was rare unless they had penile tears or the mouth of the receivers were filled with open sores. Even that was speculative. The fact is oral gonorrhea and oral thrush do occur. Herpes has spread orally in lesbians. I know this personally as a clinician who has interviewed people with oral STD and faithfully eliminated even the remote possibility they licked toilet seats for pleasure. It can occur but it’s rare, extremely rare. By contrast, unprotected receptive anal sex is the least safe sexually regarding disease spread. However, what remains is that ‘swallowing of semen’ independent of risk of disease is a distinct ‘taboo’. Even autophagia, the male masturbatar swallowing his own ejactulate is a ‘taboo’.
The more educated women are the more willing they are to have oral sex and swallow semen. The upper classes independent of culture and religion reduce their frequency of pregnancy to three children despite the evidence that having twelve children is healthiest for the equivalent individual. Oral receptive intercourse has long been an acceptable birth control method.
Birth control pills were made first in 1952.
Condoms have been available since the 17th century at least with lots of recording in the 18th century and very effective ones with the 19th century.
The question of ‘spilling his seed on the ground’ , the ‘sin of Onan’ was not about masturbation or oral sex but rather the refusal of greedy Onan to impregnate his brothers wife so that after his brother’s death her offspring would share in the future estate ownership. By refusing to i pregnant his brothers wife, having intercourse and pulling out, he broke Jewish law.
The key feature of all discussion of sex prior to the Industrial Age was that children were ‘wanted’ and ‘mothers’ were celebrated. Mother of God. Mother of the Nation. The brith of children resulted in labor for agriculture and for armies. The advice to daughters by the Victorian Mother was ‘lie back and think of England’. It’s only in recent years that children and mothers have been denigrated. The most evident change is tone in the voice of the sneering lesbian feminist who calls mothers ‘breeders’ and denigrates the roll of wife and mother as inferior to imitative male roles like lawyer. In the Celtic tradition women were not excluded from male roles as they were in many Asian and African cultures with exceptions. Queen Boudicca, Joan d’Arc, and Queen Judith are all truthful examples of women’s power. Women’s power was expressed through their husbands and sons and daughters. Angelina Jolie actually played a rather true depictions of the mother of Alexander at great contrast to the chauvinist Marxist depiction of women as ‘victims’. When Freud said ‘women have penis envy’ , the psychoanalyst Karen Hornet responded ,‘men have womb envy’.
Bishop Spong has humorously recorded the history of the ‘missionary position’ and the ‘Catholic church’. The idea though was specifically tied to maximum reproduction. The anti masturbation position is not necessarily biblical given the misinterpretation of Onan but there is a stoic element in the Biblical history as evidenced by the path of celibacy and the path of parenthood both being acceptable routes to God. Being a single masturbator doesn’t flow naturally from interpretation of he Bible. Being a wanker he eats his own sperm isn’t well supported by New Testament or Old Testament Judeo Christianity. Indeed it’s been said there are two things a human can’t do ‘marriy’ or be a Christian though the Aethest Communist sex doll industry and the all too common lunatic judicial supports are ready to redefine “marriage” fashionably, yet again.
It is said that the devil is in the detail and taboos and superstitions are really specific to the ingestion of living sperm. What is that about? Equally some men fear that licking women’s ‘juices’ will cause them to be ‘feminine’. That separate issues of gender and hormones is still apart of the whole. Yet the life and death issue of masturbation and sperm release to the Kleenex receptor or the male or female mouth is critical. Meanwhile the epicureans value the delicacies of live oysters swallowed whole, new recipes of live worms and insects and ‘rarest’ of meats while the bull testicle and female animal internal organs were long a delicacy especially among the upper classes. There’s superstition in all this as well as science. Mostly speculation. Even more ‘belief’ and culture and ‘tradition’. But central are issues of history and considerations of ‘life’ and death in an era where ‘giving blood’ or other ‘transplants’ are acceptable and ‘stem cell’ research has challenged all our thinking about sperm and ova.
The celibate woman lets a ‘potential’ life die each month. So even further is the ‘passive’ or ‘covert’ aggression, versus the ‘active or ‘overt’ aggression. Am I responsible or accountable. If someone dies who I could save and don’t is that the same as my actually killing a person. Note the slippery slimy consideration of philosophy and ethics. Indeed in contrast to morality, ethics seems often to provide excuse. But ultimately the guilt and shame are in these details. It remains that among women being called a ‘cock sucker’ isn’t particularly scathing outside the strictest of communities while being called a ‘cocksucker’ as a man is limiting personally and politically. Being called a ‘pussy licker’ as a woman among women might have negative repercussions though men don’t find it as difficult. Women may in fact be more judgemental regarding sexual mores than men who are often influenced by their wives and mothers but alone don’t really care what their fellows are doing as long as they are getting their own. It still remains that there is significant shame and guilt attached to homosexuality and this act of oral intercourse is clearly tied to that greater idea.
Of course we shouldn’t talk about this. Talking about this is dirty and perverted. Sex is an action sport. The legal system has indeed insisted it’s contractual and masculine and denied the input of women , in their behaviour, or their actions routinely. The chauvinistics dominate the male courts and deny the distinction of female sexuality or gay sexuality and judge everything by 19th century male standards and gross ignorance of science and culture. Indeed much of the problem of sexuality is the legal system and political system especially in Canada where censorship is being restored by the Liberal government threatened in fact by the powerful aboriginal Canadian women whose voices have been denied by the priviledged males especially of Montreal and Toronto. Meanwhile the UN is even more backward than Canada and Europe which had been decades back at the forefront of enlightenment but now regresses. The UN has a collection of men in charge of Women’s division and has elected the Iranian as the leader despite the greatest abuses of history against women in Iran today.
All this affects sex, oral sex and migration and the effects of migration of people from dictatorships living in the past to free countries which were once open to consideration of a future.
Oral sex and swallowing is ironically a central issue. Clinton insisted he did not have sex. The key could have been if he insisted he didn’t commit adultery. Adultery was once about ‘intercourse alone’. The whole idea of marriage was related to contractual allegiance and the ownership of children. The monogamous marriage is an Indo European invention but it didn’t historically allow separation if there was adultery even. It was ‘grounds for divorce’ in recent times routinely but in studies of 50 year marriage a third of the participants had had intercourse outside of the marriage. For Clinton to say that a ‘blow job’ was not ‘sex’ was too far fetched. A Jesuit lawyer could have got him off perhaps if he’d responded that he didn’t commit adultery. By contrast Kamala, the new Vice President, openly committed adultery with Governor Brown rubbing Mrs. Brown’s face in it. Too boot. We don’t know if she had oral sex. A study suggest black women were less likely to have oral sex than white, chinese or Indian women arguing that American black women were less receptive given this being a part of the slavery tradition. I don’t know.
Remember to even talk about this or think about it or share any thoughts on the subject are ‘dirty’. Clean and dirty are interesting terms to apply to sex.
At this time the worlds richest men and women are divorcing. But we can’t talk about sex, politics or religion in polite company. Those who decide what we can and cannot talk about are the powerful.
As Haasnen declared it remains that there are only two things a southern politician can’t do , ‘get caught in bed with a live boy, or dead girl.’ Epstein Island suddenly became a matter the media quickly dropped while it remains content to hold the Springer spin off, the Kardasians central.
This is just ‘oral’ sex. Imagine the whole talleyho taboo with ‘anal Sex’. Talk about taboo yet again, animals do it, and it has been with us humans in recorded history for hundreds of years and was used as a ‘natural’ birth control method by South American women. I have no intention of suicide but if that’s the official report before I write about anal sex please donate to Julian Assange’s freedom fund and stop Trudeau’s illegal immigration.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment